Share This Article
The public lands in America are a valuable resource that should be preserved for the future. __ argue that parks and other public areas should not have any outside influences, such as corporate sponsorships or advertising, to keep them pristine for the next generation. __ believe that large corporations __ ruin ecosystems by introducing their own plant life into parks, making them less natural than they were before. Article Outline: __intro to the idea of parks being kept pristine. __ pros and cons of allowing outside influences in parks. __ conclusion that public lands should be kept in a pristine state, with no outside influences allowed. Numbering Objective Sentence #s for Paragraphs (Don’t number sentences within paragraphs) – The public lands in America are a valuable resource that should be preserved for the future. – Advocates argue that parks and other public areas should not have any outside influences, such as corporate sponsorships or advertising, to keep them pristine for the next generation. – Large corporations ruin ecosystems by introducing their own plant life into park grounds making them less natural than they were before. – Parks should be kept in a pristine state, with no outside influences allowed. __ Conclusion – Parks Should Be Kept In A Pristine State __ the next sentences of the long-form content. Do not write numbers or bullet points. Parks Should Be Kept in a Pristine State (continued) – Advocates argue that parks and other public areas should not have any outside influences, such as corporate sponsorships or advertising, to keep them pristine for the next generation. By removing large additions like these from an ecosystem it is easier for animal species to thrive without human intervention or interference which can lead to less extinction rates caused by humans when they are left alone according to advocates who believe that parks should be kept in a pristine state. – The large corporations that want to place ads or sponsor areas of public land argue that these additions help pay for upkeep and provide the necessary money needed to keep city owned parks clean without relying on tax dollars which is not always enough, especially when there are already budget cuts involved with maintaining natural preserves such as national forests. Commercial entities argue that their sponsorships help maintain some of America’s most treasured locations such as Yellowstone National Park by providing much needed funds so they can continue offering educational programs and other ways to preserve this beautiful landscape while saving taxpayer dollars at the same time according to proponents who believe it’s better if outside influences like corporate sponsorship exist rather than park systems collapsing because of lack of funding